

"I told them, I don't do this for the money. I want to have fun and have impact."
Dear Entrepreneur,
Imagine this: You spend 13 years building a company. You bootstrap it from your Vienna apartment. You grow it to 70+ employees. Your code powers PDF functionality on over 1 billion devices. Apple, Dropbox, and Adobe use your technology. You exit for a reported $100 million.
And then... you feel nothing.
Empty. Hollow. Like someone sucked the mojo right out of you.
This is the story of Peter Steinberger, the 44-year-old Austrian developer who went from post-exit burnout to creating the most viral AI project the world has ever seen - a tool so powerful that it triggered personal calls from Mark Zuckerberg and a hiring offer from Sam Altman himself.
🔥 Act I: The Emptiness After "Success"
Let me paint you a picture of what "success" looked like for Peter in 2023:
A nine-figure exit from PSPDFKit, his PDF software company
Financial freedom for life
The ability to do anything, go anywhere
And absolutely zero motivation to do any of it
If you wake up in the morning and you have nothing to look forward to, you have no real challenge, that gets very boring, very fast.
After selling his shares in 2023, Peter tried everything to fill the void:
✈️ He booked a one-way ticket to Madrid and "disappeared from space"
🎉 He partied hard
🧘 He did "plenty of therapy"
🍄 He even tried ayahuasca
🌍 He moved countries
Nothing worked.
Here was a man who had achieved what most entrepreneurs only dream of, and he felt like Austin Powers after Dr. Evil sucked out his mojo. He couldn't get code out anymore. He just stared at the screen, feeling empty.
📊 The PSPDFKit Success Story (VERIFIED):
13 years
Building duration: 2011-2024
1B+
Devices powered: Over 1 billion devices use PSPDFKit's code (Source: TechCrunch, 2021)
~$100M
Exit valuation: Reported $100 million exit (Source: Multiple industry sources, exact figure unconfirmed)
€116M
Funding raised: €100+ million from Insight Partners in 2021 before exit (Source: Insight Partners press release)
The Breaking Point
For Peter, the problem wasn't money. It was purpose.
You see, Peter had poured 200% of his time, energy, and heart's blood into PSPDFKit. He was the guy who bootstrapped a PDF framework while waiting six months for a U.S. work visa. The company had become his identity.
And when that identity was stripped away? He discovered what many successful founders never talk about: the crushing weight of purposelessness that comes after selling your dream.
⚡ Act II: The Spark That Changed Everything
Fast forward to April 2025.
Peter was watching the AI revolution unfold from the sidelines. Everyone was talking about ChatGPT, Claude, and the future of AI agents. And something inside him stirred.
He had a simple idea: What if he could build an AI agent that actually DID things instead of just chatting?
"I was annoyed that it didn't exist, so I just prompted it into existence." — Peter Steinberger
On a random day in late 2025, Peter sat down at his computer and built the first prototype of what would become OpenClaw.
It took him exactly one hour.
Let that sink in. One hour to build the prototype that would eventually become the fastest-growing open-source project in GitHub history.
📊 OpenClaw's Meteoric Rise (VERIFIED):
1 hour
Time to build prototype: Initial working version (Source: Peter's interview with Lex Fridman)
196,000+
GitHub stars: Reached 196,000 stars by mid-February 2026 (Source: Forbes, LinkedIn)
60 days
Growth period: From 9,000 to 179,000 stars in just 60 days (Source: Mintlify)
2M+
Weekly visitors: 2 million website visitors per week at peak (Source: Forbes, Tom's Hardware)
1.5M
Agents created: 1.5 million AI agents created by early February 2026 (Source: Financial Times, Tom's Hardware)
What Made OpenClaw Different?
Unlike traditional AI chatbots that sit and wait for your commands, OpenClaw was autonomous. It could:
📧 Manage your emails while you sleep
🌐 Control web browsers to complete workflows
💬 Run through messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram
🏠 Control smart home devices
🎵 Manage your Spotify playlists based on your calendar
🛒 Order coffee when it detects you have a morning meeting
But here's the crazy part: This wasn't just another side project for Peter. It was his 44th AI-related project since 2009. He'd been quietly tinkering with AI for over a decade while everyone else was just discovering ChatGPT.
The Naming Saga: From Clawdbot to OpenClaw
Peter's journey wasn't smooth. The project went through multiple identity crises:
Clawdbot: The original name
Moltbot: After Anthropic raised trademark concerns
OpenClaw: The final evolution
Each rebrand brought chaos. Bad actors associated with cryptocurrency briefly hijacked his accounts during one transition. Peter was so exhausted he almost deleted the entire project.
I was close to crying. I was like, 'I did show you the future, you build it.'" Peter Steinberger, during the darkest moments
But he didn't quit. And thank God for that.
💰 Act III: The $10,000-Per-Month Money Pit That Everyone Wanted
Here's where the story gets really interesting.
By early 2026, OpenClaw was exploding. GitHub stars were accumulating at a pace never seen before. The tech world was going absolutely bonkers over this AI agent framework.
But Peter had a problem: He was losing between $10,000 to $20,000 per month just keeping the servers running.
💸 The Financial Reality (VERIFIED):
-$10-20K
Monthly burn rate: Peter was losing $10,000-$20,000 per month on server costs (Source: Reddit discussions, Linas Substack)
$0
Revenue: The project had ZERO revenue—it was completely open-source and free
0
Employees: Peter was doing everything himself—no team, no company structure
Think about that for a second. Here's a project with:
❌ No employees
❌ No revenue
❌ Hemorrhaging tens of thousands per month
✅ 2 million weekly visitors
✅ Nearly 200,000 GitHub stars
✅ 1.5 million agents created
And every major AI company in the world wanted a piece of it.
The Offers Start Pouring In
Peter suddenly found himself in a position most founders would kill for: a bidding war between tech titans.
Mark Zuckerberg reached out personally. During a podcast with Lex Fridman, Zuck actually tested OpenClaw live and gave Peter feedback. "That was a good first start," Zuckerberg said; high praise from someone who's built one of the world's largest tech companies.
Meta made an offer. Anthropic was interested. Various VCs were circling. Everyone wanted to know: What would Peter do?
Why Sam Altman Won
On February 15, 2026, Peter made his decision: He was joining OpenAI.
Sam Altman announced it with characteristic brevity on Twitter/X:
Peter Steinberger is joining OpenAI to drive the next generation of personal agents. He is a genius with a lot of amazing ideas.
But here's the twist that makes this story so compelling for entrepreneurs: Peter didn't sell out.
Instead of letting OpenAI acquire OpenClaw, Peter negotiated something unprecedented:
✅ He joins OpenAI to work on bringing agents to everyone
✅ OpenClaw becomes an independent foundation, staying open-source
✅ OpenAI sponsors the project but doesn't own it
✅ The community stays intact, free to innovate
🧠 Act IV: The Mind-Bending Way Peter Actually Builds Software
Now here's where things get REALLY fascinating for those of us who build things.
Peter doesn't code the way you do. He doesn't code the way anyone does.
In January 2026 alone, Peter made over 6,600 commits to the OpenClaw repository. To put that in perspective, that's more commits in one month than most developers make in an entire year.
👨💻 Peter's Coding Stats (VERIFIED):
6,600+
Commits in January 2026: From a single person (Source: Pragmatic Engineer newsletter)
5-10
Simultaneous agents: Peter runs 5-10 AI coding agents working on different features at once
44
AI projects since 2009: OpenClaw was his 44th AI-related experiment
His Secret: He Ships Code He Doesn't Read
Let that headline sink in for a moment.
Peter Steinberger, the guy who built software running on a billion devices, openly admits: "I ship code I don't read."
Here's his actual workflow:
He runs 5-10 AI coding agents simultaneously (Claude, Codex, etc.)
He spends hours planning WITH the agents, not just prompting them
He challenges the agents, pushes back, refines the plan
Once satisfied, he kicks off the agent and moves to the next feature
The agents write, test, and validate their own code
He reviews the RESULTS, not the code
From the commits, it might appear like it's a company. But it's not. This is one dude sitting at home having fun
Why This Matters for Every Entrepreneur Reading This
Peter isn't just using AI as a coding assistant. He's operating like a one-person tech company by treating AI agents as his distributed engineering team.
Here are his key insights that you can steal:
🌍 Act V: What This Means to Entrepreneurs (The Real Lessons)
Okay, so we've covered a lot. But let's bring this back to what matters for YOU as an entrepreneur or startup founder.
What can you actually LEARN from Peter's journey?
Lesson #1: Post-Exit Depression Is Real (And Nobody Talks About It)
Peter spent THREE YEARS wandering in the wilderness after his exit. Three years of therapy, ayahuasca, country-hopping, and existential emptiness.
The startup world glorifies the exit. We talk about "making it." But we don't talk about the crushing emptiness that can follow when your purpose disappears overnight.
Lesson #2: The "Overnight Success" Took 44 Attempts
OpenClaw was Peter's 44th AI project. Think about that. 43 projects that nobody talks about. 43 experiments that didn't go viral. 43 attempts that taught him exactly what he needed to know to make #44 explode.
The media narrative is "developer builds AI agent in 1 hour, gets hired by OpenAI." The reality is "developer spends 15+ years mastering his craft, builds 44th project in 1 hour, recognition follows."
Lesson #3: Open Source Can Be Your Moat (But Not the Way You Think)
Peter made OpenClaw completely open-source and free. He lost $10-20K per month running it. It had no revenue model.
And yet, it became one of the most valuable assets in the AI ecosystem.
Why? Because distribution beats monetization in the early stages of a paradigm shift.
196,000 GitHub stars = massive mindshare
2 million weekly visitors = proof of demand
1.5 million agents created = ecosystem validation
Community of passionate builders = network effects
OpenAI didn't hire Peter for the code. They hired him for the vision, the community, and the proof that people want autonomous agents.
Lesson #4: AI Is Making the One-Person Company Real
Peter demonstrated something that will define the next decade of entrepreneurship: One person with AI agents can now do what used to require a team of 20+ engineers.
He made 6,600 commits in a month. He built a framework with 196,000 GitHub stars. He created a tool with 2 million weekly users. BY HIMSELF.
This isn't theoretical. This is happening RIGHT NOW.
🔮 The Future Is Here:
2010: You need 10 engineers to build a competitive SaaS product
2020: You need 3-5 engineers with modern frameworks and cloud tools
2026: You need 1 person with AI agents and the right architecture
The question for every entrepreneur: Are you building your business for the 2020 reality or the 2026 reality?
Lesson #5: Your Personal Brand IS Your Unfair Advantage
Peter built in public. He shared his journey. He was honest about his struggles with burnout and finding purpose again.
When OpenClaw exploded, it wasn't just the tool that people connected with—it was Peter's story.
The founder who built a unicorn and felt empty afterward
The developer who tried 43 projects before finding the one
The builder who chose impact over a second exit
That narrative is what got Mark Zuckerberg to reach out. That's what convinced Sam Altman to make the hire. The code was impressive, but the founder was magnetic.
🦞 Forward this to 3 entrepreneur friends who can get inspired.











